Quality of Primary Education in Bannu Division: An Analysis of Quality of Input, Process, and Output Indicators

Authors

  • Wali Ullah Khan PhD Scholar, Department of Eduction and Research, University of Science & Technology, Bannu, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
  • Dr. Safdar Rehman Ghazi Professor/Pro Vice Chancellor, University of Science & Technology, Bannu,, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
  • Dr. Ahmad Ali Assistant Professor, Institute of Business Administration (IBA), Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
  • Dr. Faheem Khan Principal, GHSS Behari Colony, Dera Ismail Khan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55737/psi.2025c-43109

Keywords:

Primary Education, SDG 4, Input Indicators, Process Indicators, Output Indicators, Bannu Division, Quality of Education

Abstract

This study examined the achievement of Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education) targets in public primary schools of Bannu Division, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, by examining input, process, and output quality indicators. The population comprised (N=19,272) teachers, of which 345 were selected through multistage stratified random sampling. A descriptive design was employed, using a self-developed questionnaire aligned with SDG-4, while data were analyzed through Mean and SD. Findings on input quality showed that school funds, classroom furniture, sanitation facilities, and safe drinking water were generally adequate, while the availability of instructional materials and sufficient teachers remained inconsistent. School management and administration were positively perceived, particularly in conflict resolution, student cooperation, and resource utilization, though coordination among staff members was weaker. Process quality indicators revealed that teaching practices were largely aligned with learning outcomes and supported by student-centered methods, yet gaps persisted in promoting conceptual learning and the effective use of educational technologies. By contrast, output quality indicators—such as student retention, completion, and academic performance—were mostly rated in the “Undecided” category. While proficiency in key subjects was acknowledged, broader measures of student success and preparedness for secondary education were less convincing. It is recommended that policy measures focus on equitable teacher deployment, improved provision of instructional materials, strengthened participatory decision-making, and enhanced community involvement. Greater emphasis on conceptual learning, assessment reforms, and accountability mechanisms is also necessary to raise student outcomes and move closer to achieving SDG 4 targets.

Author Biography

  • Wali Ullah Khan, PhD Scholar, Department of Eduction and Research, University of Science & Technology, Bannu, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

    Corresponding Author: adnanjeejia@gmail.com

References

Adams, D. (1993). Defining Educational Quality. Educational Planning, 9(3), 3-18.

Addey, C. (2021). Passports to the Global South, UN flags, favourite experts: understanding the interplay between UNESCO and the OECD within the SDG4 context. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 19(5), 593-604. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2020.1862643

Ailaan, A. (2018). 2018 Five Years of Education Reforms in the Punjab. Wins, Losses and challenges for, 2023.

Akram, M., & Khan, F. J. (2007). Public provision of education and government spending in Pakistan. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics Working Paper. PIDE.

Boone, H. N., & Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing Likert data. Journal of Extension, 50(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.50.02.48

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning policy institute.

Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Government of Pakistan. (2022). Pakistan education statistics 2020–21. Academy of Educational Planning and Management, Ministry of Federal Education and Professional Training.

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Nyutu, E., Cobern, W. W., & Pleasants, B. A.-S. (2020). Correlational Study of Student Perceptions of their Undergraduate Laboratory Environment with respect to Gender and Major. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 9(1), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1182

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in nursing & health, 29(5), 489-497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147

Rovinelli, R. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1977). On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Dutch Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 49–60.

Taherdoost, H. (2017). Determining sample size; How to calculate survey sample size. International Journal of Economics and Management Systems, 2(2), 237–239. https://iaras.org/iaras/filedownloads/ijems/2017/007-0032(2017).pdf

Tikly, L., & Barrett, A. M. (2011). Social justice, capabilities, and the quality of education in low-income countries. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.06.001

UNESCO. (2015). Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4. UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education.United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707

World Bank. (2018). World development report 2018: Learning to realize education’s promise. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1096-1

Downloads

Published

2025-09-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Khan, W. U., Ghazi, S. R., Ali, A., & Khan, F. (2025). Quality of Primary Education in Bannu Division: An Analysis of Quality of Input, Process, and Output Indicators. ProScholar Insights, 4(3), 112-122. https://doi.org/10.55737/psi.2025c-43109