Review Policy

At PROSCHOLAR INSIGHTS (PSI), we are dedicated to ensuring the highest standards of scholarly excellence in the realm of education research and insights. Our journal aims to publish well-researched, original, and thought-provoking articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge and understanding in the field of education.

Peer-Review Process:

All submissions to ProScholar Insights (PSI) undergo a rigorous and anonymous double-blind peer-review process. This means that both the reviewer and the author remain anonymous to each other to ensure an impartial evaluation of each manuscript. Our objective is to provide authors with constructive and honest feedback that enhances the quality of their work.

Reviewer Selection:

Our journal relies on a diverse and experienced pool of reviewers who are experts in various sub-disciplines within the field of education. Based on their qualifications and expertise, we select reviewers who possess the necessary knowledge to evaluate and provide insightful comments on each submitted manuscript. We strive to maintain a fair balance between early-career researchers and established scholars.

Review Criteria:

Reviewers at ProScholar Insights (PSI) evaluate each manuscript based on the following criteria:

  1. Originality: We look for articles that present original research or novel perspectives on existing theoretical frameworks. We encourage authors to highlight any new insights, methodologies, or implications for practice and policy.
  2. Methodological Rigor: We assess the soundness and appropriateness of the methodology employed in the research design. Reviewers evaluate the clarity of research objectives, data collection and analysis procedures, and the validity and reliability of the findings.
  3. Contribution to the Field: Manuscripts should contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of education. Reviewers evaluate the significance, relevance, and potential impact of the research in addressing important educational issues or filling gaps in current literature.
  4. Clarity and Coherence: We assess the overall organization, clarity of writing, and logical flow of arguments. Reviewers consider the manuscript's readability and the effectiveness of its communication of key ideas, allowing for a wider audience to understand and engage with the work.

Confidentiality and Anonymity:

All manuscripts submitted to ProScholar Insights (PSI) are treated with utmost confidentiality. Reviewers are required to maintain strict confidentiality regarding the contents of the manuscripts they review. The identities of reviewers are not disclosed to the authors, and vice versa, to ensure unbiased evaluations.

Conflict of Interest:

Reviewers are requested to declare any potential conflicts of interest that may arise from personal or professional relationships with the authors or institutions associated with the submitted manuscript. Any such conflicts will be taken into account while assigning reviewers to manuscripts.

We believe that our comprehensive and transparent review policy ensures the quality and integrity of the articles published in ProScholar Insights (PSI). By upholding these standards, we strive to promote excellence in education research and encourage scholarly dialogue among researchers, practitioners, and policymakers worldwide.