Effective Teaching Strategies for Physically Disabled Students: A Reflective Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62997/psi.2025b-42061Keywords:
Teaching Strategies, Reflective Approach, Reflective PractitionerAbstract
The study explored how teachers of special education handle working with physically disabled students in specialized education settings through phenomenological research. The research focused on finding out how reflective practice affected teaching methods and student achievement outcomes. Through in-depth interviews researchers collected most of their data. A guide structured the conversations between the researchers and participants. The research relied on purposive sampling that identified physical disability teachers to achieve various viewpoints and teaching experiences. Qualitative data received thematic analysis as the research method which enabled researchers to identify dominant themes and patterns that emerged from teaching experiences with reflective practice. Teachers identified Gibbs Reflective Cycle as a vital system which organized their reflective improvement activities. Exceptional educators argue that reflection generates better learning results because it boosts conceptual analysis and promotes both student physical disability engagement and classroom cultural variety. The study indicated that PBL and IBL together with technology-enhanced teaching along with cooperative learning make powerful tools for reflective practice enhancement. These teaching methods work to boost student participation by requiring educators to perform ongoing assessment and development of their educational approaches. The research findings will develop frameworks for teaching professional development of special education instructors and also provide important strategies for teachers seeking instructional enhancement until these methods spearhead optimal learning conditions for whole student populations.
References
Awidi, I. T., & Klutsey, J. Q. (2024). Using online critical reflection to enhance students’ confidence, motivation, and engagement in higher education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09751-4
Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem‐based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1996(68), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219966804
Bytyqi, B. (2022). Project-Based Learning: A teaching approach where learning comes alive. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 775. https://doi.org/10.22190/jtesap2104775b
Chen, X., Li, Y., & Chen, Y. (2021). The effects of technology-based teaching strategies and reflective practice on student engagement and motivation. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 8(1), 1-20.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (4th ed.). Sage.
Daniels, H. (2002). Vygotsky and Pedagogy. Routledge.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. John Wiley & Sons.
Donmez, M. (2024). Educational technology for physically disabled people: A systematic literature review. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 7(2), 581-606. https://doi.org/10.33400/kuje.1506082
Fernandes, P. R. D. S., Jardim, J., & Lopes, M. C. D. S. (2021). The soft skills of special education teachers: Evidence from the literature. Education Sciences, 11(3), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030125
Ghaznavi, N., Narafshan, M. H., & Tajadini, M. (2021). Ego-resiliency and physically-disabled learners: the implementation of a multiple intelligences teaching approach. Research and Development in Medical Education, 10(1), 4-4.
Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by Doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Oxford: Further Education Unit, Oxford Polytechnic.
Government of Pakistan. (2020). Punjab Special Education Policy 2020. Ministry of Education. https://sed.punjab.gov.pk/system/files/Special%20Education%20Policy%202020.pdf
Jariono, G., Nugroho, H., Lestari, I., Marganingrum, T., Yani, T. P., Kartasurya, P., & Gle Gapui, J. (2022). Teacher's Ability In Applying Adaptive Physical Education To Children With Special Needs. Medikora, 21(1), 90-99.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Allyn and Bacon.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2021). Learning together and alone: the history of our involvement in cooperative learning. In N. Davidson (Ed.), Pioneering perspectives in Cooperative Learning: theory, research, and classroom practice for diverse approaches to CL (pp. 44–62). Routledge.
Joseph, V., Sheikh, I., & Rajani, S. (2022). Inquiry Based Learning Method Of Teaching In Education: A Literature Review. Webology, 19(3).
Kamran, F., Kanwal, A., Afzal, A., & Rafiq, S. (2023). Impact of interactive teaching methods on students learning outcomes at university level. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 7(7), 89-105. https://spe-jpsp.com/wp-content/uploads/2023-1-8.pdf
Khatter, A., Thalaachawr, K., & Blyth, M. (2024). Student engagement and fostering ownership of learning. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 291-302. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2024.7.1.38
Lai, J., & Lin, Y. (2019). The effect of cooperative learning and reflective practice on job satisfaction and motivation among elementary school teachers. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(3), 23–30.
Loughran, J. (2013). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: Understanding teaching & learning about teaching. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203019672
Merritt, J., Lee, M. Y., Rillero, P., & Kinach, B. M. (2017). Problem-based learning in K–8 mathematics and science education: A literature review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1674
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.
Perlado Lamo de Espinosa, I., Muñoz Martínez, Y., & Torrego Seijo, J. C. (2021). Students with special educational needs and cooperative learning in the ordinary classroom: some learnings from teaching practice. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs: JORSEN, 21(3), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12511
Pramesworo, I. S., Sembiring, D., Sarip, M., Lolang, E., & Fathurrochman, I. (2023). Identification of new approaches to information technology-Based Teaching for successful teaching of Millennial Generation entering 21st century education. JURNAL IQRA, 8(1), 350–370. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v8i1.2722
Sathiadas, M. G. (2019). Reflective Practitioner. Jaffna Medical Journal, 31(1). http://doi.org/10.4038/jmj.v31i1.58
Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books.
Tariq, T., Islam, M., & Hamza, S. I. (2024). Effect of Reflective Learning Practices on Critical Thinking Skills and Motivation of Undergraduate Students. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 8(4), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2024(8-IV)04
Tinsley, G. N. (2023). An Exploration of Rural Teachers’ Reflective Practices and Student Intrinsic Motivation, Student-Teacher Relationships, and Student Engagement. Freed-Hardeman University.
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732x09349791