Perceptions of Teachers Regarding the Marks’ Reduction of Practical/Laboratory Work at the Secondary School Level

Authors

  • Saima Zaman Khalil Principal, University Model School, University of Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Author
  • Khadija M.Ed Students, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62997/psi.2022a.79113

Keywords:

Practical/Laboratory Work, Marks’ Reduction, Teachers Perceptions

Abstract

Perceptions of teachers regarding the marks’ reduction of practical/laboratory work at the secondary school level were designed to achieve the objectives of exploring the perceptions of teachers regarding the marks’ reduction of practical/laboratory work at the secondary school level and to investigate the influence of marks’ reduction on students learning at secondary school level. The study was descriptive in nature, in which the current status of the subject was studied. All the female teachers in government girls’ high schools of district Swabi comprise the population of the study. Twenty female secondary school teachers were purposefully selected from the population. A closed-ended questionnaire for teachers was developed on a 3-point scale. The percentage was used as a statistical tool for the analysis of collected data. Based on findings, it was concluded that most teachers believed practical/lab work has much importance in science subjects. Respondents agreed that it is the only way to demonstrate the anatomy of different organisms and plants. Reduced marks may affect students’ grades in SSC examinations. Students also take less interest due to reduced marks in practical work. Less lab work affects teachers' own talent. Less lab work also wastes precious lab material. Most of the teachers were in favor of increasing practical marks to 25.

References

Abdi, A. (2014). The effect of inquiry-based learning method on students’ academic achievement in science course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2014.020104

Bryson, K.M.N., Millar, H., Joseph, A. & Mobolurin, A. (2002). Using formal MS/OR modeling to support disaster recovery planning. European Journal of Operational Research, 141(3), 679-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00275-2

Cobb, P., McClain, K., Lamberg, T., & Dean, C. (2003). Situating teachers’ instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x032006013

Fadzil, H.M., & Saat, R.M. (2013). Phenomenographic study of students’ manipulative skills during transition from primary to secondary school. Sains Humanika, 63(2), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v63.2013

Hinneh, J.T. (2017). Attitude towards Practical Work and Students’ Achievement in Biology: A Case of a Private Senior Secondary School in Gaborone, Botswana. IOSR Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM), 13(4), 06-11.

Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V.N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 201-217. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543052002201

Hofstein, A., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2007). The laboratory in science education: the state of the art. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 105-107. https://doi.org/10.1039/B7RP90003A

Jokiranta, K. (2014). The Effectiveness of Practical work in Science Education. Bachelor’s Thesis.

Lawson, A.E. (1995). Science teaching and the development of thinking. Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Okam, C.C., & Zakari, I.I. (2017) Impact of Laboratory-Based Teaching Strategy on Students’ Attitudes and Mastery of Chemistry in Katsina Metropolis, Katsina State, Nigeria. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 6(1), 112-121.

Schwichow, M., Zimmerman, C., Croker, S., & Härtig, H. (2016). What students learn from hands‐on activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 980–1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21320

Sotiriou, S., Bybee, R.W., & Bogner, F.X. (2017). PATHWAYS–A Case of Large-Scale Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice in Scientific Inquiry-Based Science Education. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(2), 8-19. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n2p8

Tsakeni, M. (2018). Inquiry-Based Practical Work in Physical Sciences: Equitable Access and Social Justice Issues. Issues in Educational Research, 28(1), 187-201.

Tobin, K. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning. School science and Mathematics, 90(5), 403-418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949- 8594.1990.tb17229.x

Yore, L.D. (2001). What is meant by constructivist science teaching and will the science education community stay the course for meaningful reform. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 5(4), 1-7.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Khalil, S. Z., & Khadija. (2022). Perceptions of Teachers Regarding the Marks’ Reduction of Practical/Laboratory Work at the Secondary School Level. ProScholar Insights, 1(1), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.62997/psi.2022a.79113